Step 1: Recall what attaining the Cramer-Rao bound really means.
An estimator hits the Cramer-Rao bound exactly when it is a constant times the score function of the likelihood, plus a shift. For a normal model with known variance, this happens only for statistics that are linear combinations of the data with equal weights on every observation.
Step 2: Write the score function for this specific model.
With $X_1,X_2\sim N(\theta,1)$ independently, \[ \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\log L(\theta)=(x_1-\theta)+(x_2-\theta)=(x_1+x_2)-2\theta \] This is a straight line in $x_1+x_2$, with slope $1$ and intercept $-2\theta$.
Step 3: Match option (A) against this score.
Option (A) is $T=X_1+X_2$. Subtracting its mean $\psi(\theta)=2\theta$ gives $(x_1+x_2)-2\theta$, which is identical to the score function from Step 2. Whenever an estimator minus its own mean equals a constant times the score, the Cramer-Rao inequality becomes an equality. So $X_1+X_2$ attains the bound.
Step 4: Confirm with a direct variance computation.
Fisher information per observation for $N(\theta,1)$ is $1$, so for two independent observations, $I_2(\theta)=2$. Since $\psi(\theta)=2\theta$ has derivative $\psi'(\theta)=2$, the Cramer-Rao bound for $T$ is \[ \frac{(\psi'(\theta))^2}{I_2(\theta)}=\frac{4}{2}=2 \] The actual variance is $Var(X_1+X_2)=1+1=2$, an exact match.
Step 5: Check option (B), the quadratic mix $\dfrac{X_1^2+X_2^2+5}{2}$.
Subtracting its own mean does not give anything proportional to $(x_1+x_2)-2\theta$, since squared terms cannot be written as a constant multiple of a linear expression. So this cannot achieve equality.
Step 6: Check option (C), the squared sum $(X_1+X_2)^2$.
Even though this is built only from $X_1+X_2$, squaring it makes it a quadratic function, not a straight line, of the score. Only the straight line case gives equality.
Step 7: Check option (D), the mismatched combination $2X_1-X_2$.
Here the weights on $X_1$ and $X_2$ are $2$ and $-1$, not equal, so this is not a constant multiple of $(x_1+x_2)-2\theta$. A quick variance check confirms it: $Var(2X_1-X_2)=4+1=5$, while estimating $\theta$ needs a bound of $1/2$. Since $5$ is nowhere near $1/2$, this estimator is far from efficient.
Step 8: Conclude.
Only the equal weighted sum $X_1+X_2$ lines up exactly with the score function. \[ \boxed{X_1+X_2\text{ attains the Cramer-Rao lower bound}} \]