Step 1: Count what is actually unknown.
There are two separate prices we might need, the laptop's price $L$ and the printer's price $Pr$, plus a third hidden unknown: how much of a discount the bundle offer carries, call it $d$. A "bundled offer to boost sales" is worded exactly like a promotional discount, so $d$ cannot be assumed to be zero just because the question is silent about it.
Step 2: See what each statement supplies.
Statement (1) supplies one number, the bundle price (42,600). Statement (2) supplies a second number, the laptop's standalone price (39,400). Together that is only 2 known numbers for 3 unknowns ($L$, $Pr$, $d$), and $L$ becomes known from Statement (2), leaving 1 equation $42{,}600 = 39{,}400+Pr-d$ for the 2 remaining unknowns $Pr$ and $d$.
Step 3: Show two different discount values give two different printer prices.
If $d=0$ (no discount at all), $Pr = 42{,}600-39{,}400 = 3{,}200$. But if $d=500$ (a modest promotional discount), $Pr = 3{,}200+500=3{,}700$. Both are consistent with the two statements, yet they give different printer prices. Since more than one value of $Pr$ fits the given data, the printer's exact price cannot be pinned down.
Step 4: Final Answer.
Because the size of the bundle discount is never given, neither statement alone, nor both together, can fix a single value for the printer's price.
\[ \boxed{\text{Both statements together are insufficient}} \]