Question

In light of the principles enshrined in Article 39A, which of the following circumstances contradicts its core objective of equal justice and free legal aid?

• A. The state provides legal aid to economically disadvantaged citizens facing criminal prosecution.
• B. A wealthy individual is given legal aid despite having adequate resources to access private legal counsel.
• C. A marginalized person is granted legal representation in a civil matter by the state.
• D. The state facilitates access to justice for those affected by socio-economic disabilities.

Hint:

Article 39A ensures free legal aid primarily to economically and socially disadvantaged individuals to promote equal justice.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Article 39A of the Indian Constitution requires the state to offer free legal aid, ensuring no citizen is denied justice due to economic or other disadvantages. The primary aim is to support individuals unable to afford legal representation.
Options (A), (C), and (D) align with Article 39A's purpose by focusing on legal aid for the underprivileged.
Option (B) opposes the constitutional principle. Providing legal aid to affluent individuals who can afford private lawyers misdirects scarce resources and undermines the goal of equal justice for those in need.
Therefore, option (B) is inconsistent with the fundamental objective of Article 39A.