In Fig. 5.10, if AC = BD, then prove that AB = CD.

From the given figure, we can observe the following relationships:
We are given that:
\[ AC = BD \quad \text{(Equation 1)} \]
Now, according to Euclid’s axiom, when equals are subtracted from equals, the remainders are also equal. This axiom allows us to subtract the same quantity from both sides of the equation. Let's subtract \( BC \) from both sides of equation (1):
\[ (AB + BC) - BC = (BC + CD) - BC \]
On simplifying both sides:
\[ AB = CD \]
Thus, we have proven that \( AB = CD \) based on the given relations and Euclid's axiom.
Consider two ‘postulates’ given below :
(i) Given any two distinct points A and B, there exists a third point C which is in between A and B.
(ii) There exist at least three points that are not on the same line.
Do these postulates contain any undefined terms? Are these postulates consistent?
Do they follow from Euclid’s postulates? Explain.