In Fig. 5.10, if AC = BD, then prove that AB = CD.

From the given figure, we can observe the following relationships:
We are given that:
\[ AC = BD \quad \text{(Equation 1)} \]
Now, according to Euclid’s axiom, when equals are subtracted from equals, the remainders are also equal. This axiom allows us to subtract the same quantity from both sides of the equation. Let's subtract \( BC \) from both sides of equation (1):
\[ (AB + BC) - BC = (BC + CD) - BC \]
On simplifying both sides:
\[ AB = CD \]
Thus, we have proven that \( AB = CD \) based on the given relations and Euclid's axiom.
Which of the following statements are true and which are false? Give reasons for your answers.
(i) Only one line can pass through a single point.
(ii) There are an infinite number of lines which pass through two distinct points.
(iii) A terminated line can be produced indefinitely on both the sides.
(iv) If two circles are equal, then their radii are equal.
(v) In Fig., if AB = PQ and PQ = XY, then AB = XY

Give a definition for each of the following terms. Are there other terms that need to be defined first? What are they, and how might you define them?
(i) parallel lines
(ii) perpendicular lines
(iii) line segment
(iv) radius of a circle
(v) square
Consider two ‘postulates’ given below :
(i) Given any two distinct points A and B, there exists a third point C which is in between A and B.
(ii) There exist at least three points that are not on the same line.
Do these postulates contain any undefined terms? Are these postulates consistent?
Do they follow from Euclid’s postulates? Explain.