Step 1: Key points from the passage.
- Ravi is hardworking and kind.
- A majority of Ravi's friends share these traits (hardworking and kind).
- A portion of Ravi's friends lack interest in sports.
Step 2: Analyze options.
- (A) "All of Ravi's friends are hardworking and kind." → Uncertain; "almost all" does not equate to "all".
- (B) "No one who is not Ravi's friend is hardworking and kind." → Not supported by the provided text.
- (C) "None of Ravi's friends are interested in sports." → Incorrect; the text states "some" are disinterested, implying others are not.
- (D) "Some of Ravi's friends are hardworking and kind." → Conclusively true, as "almost all" necessitates "some". \[\boxed{\text{The correct answer is (D).}}\]
There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and decide where (option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.
Sentence: Beyond undermining the monopoly of the State on the use of force, armed conflict also creates an environment that can enable organized crime to prosper.
Paragraph:
(1) Linkages between illicit arms, organized crime, and armed conflict can reinforce one another while also escalating and prolonging violence and eroding governance.
(2) __
Financial gains from crime can lengthen or intensify armed conflicts by creating revenue streams for non-State armed groups (NSAGs).
(3) __
In this context, when hostilities cease and parties to a conflict move towards a peaceful resolution, the widespread availability of surplus arms and ammunition can contribute to a situation of 'criminalized peace' that obstructs sustainable peacebuilding efforts.
There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and decide where (option 1, 2, 3 or 4) the following sentence would best fit.
Sentence: For theoretical purposes, arguments may be considered as freestanding entities, abstracted from their contexts of use in actual human activities.
Paragraph : (1). An argument can be defined as a complex symbolic structure where some parts, known as the premises, offer support to another part, the conclusion. Alternatively, an argument can be viewed as a complex speech act consisting of one or more acts of premising (which assert propositions in favor of the conclusion), an act of concluding, and a stated or implicit marker ("hence", "therefore") that indicates that the conclusion follows from the premises.. (2)_. The relation of support between premises and conclusion can be cashed out in different ways: the premises may guarantee the truth of the conclusion, or make its truth more probable; the premises may imply the conclusion; the premises may make the conclusion more acceptable (or assertible).(3)__. But depending on one's explanatory goals, there is also much to be gained from considering arguments as they in fact occur in human communicative practices.