Question:medium

If \(\tau\) and \(p\) denote intercept time and slowness, respectively, in the \(\tau-p\) diagram, then which one of the following is CORRECT for a P-wave propagating inside the Earth?

Show Hint

A smooth single τ-p branch means velocity rises monotonically; a break/offset between two branches signals a low-velocity zone sandwiched between two increasing-velocity regions.
Updated On: Jul 21, 2026
  • Velocity continuously increases with depth
  • Velocity continuously decreases with depth
  • Velocity initially increases then decreases and again increases with depth
  • Velocity initially decreases then increases and again decreases with depth
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Think of it the other way round, starting from the travel-time curve rather than \(\tau(p)\) directly. If \(v(z)\) increased monotonically everywhere, \(dp/dx\) would never change sign and the \(x(p)\)/\(t(p)\) curves would be single-valued and smooth, so \(\tau(p)\) would trace one unbroken curve. A break in the plotted \(\tau-p\) curve means that over some depth interval \(dv/dz\) must have gone negative — i.e. a low-velocity zone — because that is the only mechanism that removes a range of turning depths (and hence a contiguous range of \(p\)) from the set of rays that actually return to the surface as first arrivals (this range instead becomes a shadow zone, filled only by weaker diffracted/head-wave energy).

Reconstructing the depth profile implied by the two branches of the figure: the upper branch corresponds to rays turning above the LVZ (velocity increasing with depth down to the top of the LVZ), the missing/discontinuous region corresponds to the LVZ (velocity decreasing), and the lower branch corresponds to rays turning below the LVZ, where velocity resumes its normal increase with depth. Hence the depth-velocity trend is increase → decrease → increase, matching option (C), consistent with classical Earth models (e.g., the asthenospheric low-velocity zone beneath the lithosphere) that produce exactly this kind of triplicated \(\tau-p\)/travel-time behaviour.

Was this answer helpful?
0