Step 1: Conceptual Foundation:
This problem addresses the Law of Total Probability and Bayes' Theorem. Events E1, E2, and E3 constitute a partition of the sample space, meaning they are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.
Step 3: Detailed Analysis:
Evaluation of each statement follows.
(A) $P(A) = P(E_1)P(E_1|A) + P(E_2)P(E_2|A) + P(E_3)P(E_3|A)$
This formula deviates from the standard Law of Total Probability. It incorrectly relates P(A) to conditional probabilities of Ei given A. The expression $P(E_i)P(E_i|A)$ does not simplify to P(A). Therefore, statement (A) is false.
(B) $P(A) = P(A|E_1)P(E_1) + P(A|E_2)P(E_2) + P(A|E_3)P(E_3)$
This statement correctly represents the Law of Total Probability. It calculates the total probability of event A by summing the probabilities of A conditioned on each event in the partition. Given that $P(A|E_i)P(E_i) = P(A \cap E_i)$, the formula simplifies to $P(A) = P(A \cap E_1) + P(A \cap E_2) + P(A \cap E_3)$, which is valid for mutually exclusive and exhaustive events. Thus, statement (B) is true.
(C) $P(E_i|A) = \frac{P(A|E_i)P(E_i)}{\sum_{j=1}^{3} P(A|E_j)P(E_j)}, i=1,2,3$
This statement accurately formulates Bayes' Theorem. The numerator, $P(A|E_i)P(E_i)$, is equivalent to $P(A \cap E_i)$ by the multiplication rule. The denominator, $\sum_{j=1}^{3} P(A|E_j)P(E_j)$, represents P(A) according to the Law of Total Probability (statement B). Consequently, the formula reduces to $P(E_i|A) = \frac{P(A \cap E_i)}{P(A)}$, which is the definition of conditional probability. Therefore, statement (C) is true.
(D) $P(A|E_i) = \frac{P(E_i|A)P(E_i)}{\sum_{j=1}^{3} P(E_i|A)P(E_j)}, i=1,2,3$
This formulation is incorrect, appearing to be a misapplication of Bayes' Theorem where the roles of A and Ei are confused. Statement (D) is thus false.
Step 4: Conclusion:
The accurate statements are (B) and (C). This corresponds to option (4).