Analysis of Statements:
We evaluate the statements by comparing physical units and applying the definition of Bohr's quantization.
Step 1: Check Unit Equivalence (Statement I)
Instead of deriving dimensional mass/length/time formulas, we can compare their standard SI units.
For Planck's constant ($h$), using the photon energy equation $E = h\nu$:
$h = \frac{E}{\nu} \Rightarrow \frac{\text{Joule}}{\text{s}^{-1}} = \text{Joule} \cdot \text{second}$
For Angular momentum ($L$), using the formula $L = r \times p$:
$L = \text{meter} \times (\text{kg} \cdot \text{m/s}) = \text{kg} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{s}$
Since $1 \text{ Joule} = 1 \text{ kg} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2$, we can rewrite the unit of $L$ as:
$L = (\text{kg} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2) \cdot \text{s} = \text{Joule} \cdot \text{second}$
Since both quantities share the unit $\text{J} \cdot \text{s}$, they have identical dimensions.
Therefore, Statement (I) is correct.
Step 2: Check Quantization Condition (Statement II)
Statement (II) claims angular momentum is an integral multiple of $h$.
Recall the fundamental postulate of the Bohr model:
$L = n\hbar$
Where $\hbar$ (h-bar) is the reduced Planck's constant:
$\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi}$
Therefore, the correct relation is:
$L = n \left( \frac{h}{2\pi} \right)$
Because of the factor $\frac{1}{2\pi}$, angular momentum is not an integral multiple of $h$ directly.
Therefore, Statement (II) is incorrect.
Final Conclusion:
Statement (I) is correct and Statement (II) is incorrect.