Question:medium

Given below are two statements:
Statement (I): A rectangular channel will be most economical when width is same as depth of flow.
Statement (II): In case of compressible flow, density of the fluid remains constant during flow.

In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below.

Show Hint

For an open rectangular channel, the most economical section occurs when the cross-section represents a semi-square, meaning width \(b = 2 \times \text{depth } y\).
For compressible flow, think of air, whose density changes dynamically under pressure gradients.
  • Both Statement (I) and Statement (II) are correct.
  • Both Statement (I) and Statement (II) are incorrect.
  • Statement (I) is correct but Statement (II) is incorrect.
  • Statement (I) is incorrect but Statement (II) is correct.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Check Statement I using the most economical channel condition.
A rectangular open channel is most hydraulically economical when its wetted perimeter is minimized for a given flow area, and working through this optimization shows the condition is reached when the base width equals twice the depth of flow, \( b = 2y \), not when the width equals the depth. So Statement I, which claims width equal to depth, is incorrect.
Step 2: Check Statement II using the definition of compressible flow.
Compressible flow is, by definition, flow in which fluid density changes appreciably in response to pressure changes, such as high-speed gas flow. A flow where density stays constant throughout is instead called incompressible flow. So Statement II has the definition backwards, and is also incorrect.
Step 3: Combine the two findings.
Since neither statement holds up when checked against the standard hydraulic and fluid mechanics definitions, both must be marked incorrect together.
\[ \boxed{\text{Both Statement (I) and Statement (II) are incorrect.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0