Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Net dipole moment of a polar linear isotropic dielectric substance is not zero even in the absence of an external electric field. Reason
(R): In absence of an external electric field, the different permanent dipoles of a polar dielectric substance are oriented in random directions.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Analysis of Assertion (A) and Reason (R) is as follows:
Assertion (A): This assertion posits that a polar linear isotropic dielectric possesses a net dipole moment even without an applied external electric field. This implies a spontaneous dipole alignment, contradicting the established behavior of polar dielectrics where external fields induce net moments.
Reason (R): This reason asserts that in the absence of an external electric field, the permanent dipoles within a polar dielectric exhibit random orientation. This random arrangement leads to the cancellation of individual dipole moments, resulting in a zero net dipole moment.
Based on this evaluation:
| (A) is correct but (R) is not correct |
| Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) |
| Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) |
| (A) is not correct but (R) is correct |
The conclusion is that option (A) is not correct but (R) is correct is the most fitting. Assertion (A) is factually incorrect by suggesting a net dipole moment without an external field, whereas reason (R) accurately describes the random dipole orientation in such conditions.
A metallic ring is uniformly charged as shown in the figure. AC and BD are two mutually perpendicular diameters. Electric field due to arc AB to O is ‘E’ magnitude. What would be the magnitude of electric field at ‘O’ due to arc ABC? 