This question involves an analysis of the boiling points of ammonia (NH₃) and phosphine (PH₃) based on their intermolecular forces, presented as an assertion and a reason.
Boiling point is the temperature at which a substance's vapor pressure equals the surrounding pressure, leading to its transition from liquid to vapor. Boiling point is directly proportional to the strength of intermolecular forces (IMFs). Stronger IMFs require more energy, thus a higher temperature, to overcome.
The relevant IMFs are:
Step 1: Analyze the Assertion (A).
Assertion: "PH₃ has lower boiling point than NH₃."
Boiling points:
Since -87.7 °C is lower than -33.34 °C, PH₃ has a lower boiling point than NH₃. Assertion (A) is true.
Step 2: Analyze the Reason (R).
Reason: "In liquid state NH₃ molecules are associated through vander waal’s forces, but PH₃ molecules are associated through hydrogen bonding."
Intermolecular forces:
The Reason incorrectly assigns van der Waals forces to NH₃ and hydrogen bonding to PH₃. Reason (R) is false.
Step 3: Conclude the relationship between Assertion and Reason.
Assertion (A) is true, and Reason (R) is false. The true explanation for Assertion (A) is that NH₃'s higher boiling point is due to strong hydrogen bonding, which PH₃ lacks.
Assertion (A) is correct, and Reason (R) is incorrect.
Therefore, the appropriate answer is: (A) is true but (R) is false.
