A different way to organise the same relationships is to call the unknown quantity we want, gear S's rotations, \(x\), and work backward through the train to P, rather than computing forward from P to S.
Let the number of rotations gear S makes be \(x\).
At the meshing point between Q (radius 20) and S (radius 40), the product of rotations and radius must match on both sides.
\[
N_Q \times 20 = x \times 40 \implies N_Q = 2x
\]
Gear Q sits on the same shaft as pulley R, so they always turn together.
\[
N_R = N_Q = 2x
\]
Pulley P and pulley R are joined by a belt, and both have radius 40, so the product-of-rotations-and-radius rule again applies between them.
\[
N_P \times 40 = N_R \times 40 \implies N_P = N_R = 2x
\]
We are told \(P\) undergoes 4.5 rotations, so \(N_P = 4.5\).
\[
2x = 4.5 \implies x = 2.25
\]
So the correct answer is 2.25 rotations.