A third way to organize this is with Vandermonde's convolution identity, \( \sum_{k} \binom{5}{k}\binom{7}{5-k} = \binom{12}{5} \), which lets us view the three qualifying cases (3, 4, or 5 men) as the complement, within this identity, of the non-qualifying cases (0, 1, or 2 men).
Vandermonde's identity gives \( \binom{5}{0}\binom{7}{5}+\binom{5}{1}\binom{7}{4}+\binom{5}{2}\binom{7}{3}+\binom{5}{3}\binom{7}{2}+\binom{5}{4}\binom{7}{1}+\binom{5}{5}\binom{7}{0} = \binom{12}{5} = 792 \). We already need only the last three terms (3, 4, or 5 men): \[ \binom{5}{3}\binom{7}{2}+\binom{5}{4}\binom{7}{1}+\binom{5}{5}\binom{7}{0} = 10\times21 + 5\times7 + 1\times1 = 210+35+1=246. \]
Splitting Vandermonde's identity into the "at least 3 men" terms reproduces the same total as before.
Therefore, the correct answer is 246.
Let R = {(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 3)}} be a relation defined on the set \( \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \). Then the minimum number of elements needed to be added in \( R \) so that \( R \) becomes an equivalence relation, is: