Taylor's permeability-void ratio relation comes from treating the soil as a bundle of capillary channels: the flow through the pores depends on how much void space is available and how well the voids connect, which the function $e^3/(1+e)$ captures. This route finds the proportionality constant $C$ from the first test, then uses it directly to predict the second permeability, instead of working with a ratio.
The relation is
\[ k = C \cdot \frac{e^3}{1+e} \]where $C$ depends only on the grain shape, size distribution and the liquid used, all of which stay fixed between the two tests.
From the first test, $e_1 = 0.60$ and $k_1 = 0.14$ cm/s. Compute the shape factor:
\[ \frac{e_1^3}{1+e_1} = \frac{0.216}{1.6} = 0.135 \]so
\[ C = \frac{k_1}{0.135} = \frac{0.14}{0.135} = 1.037 \]Now use this same $C$ at $e_2 = 0.80$:
\[ \frac{e_2^3}{1+e_2} = \frac{0.512}{1.8} = 0.2844 \] \[ k_2 = C \times 0.2844 = 1.037 \times 0.2844 = 0.295 \ \text{cm/s} \]This matches the direct ratio method, since $C$ is just $k_1$ divided by its own shape factor. The result shows permeability grows fast with void ratio (a cube-power relation), so going from $e = 0.60$ to $e = 0.80$, only a 33% rise in void ratio, more than doubles the permeability.
The permeability at void ratio 0.80 works out to about 0.29 cm/s.
\[ \boxed{k_2 \approx 0.29 \ \text{cm/s}} \]For the flow setup shown, hydraulic conductivities are $k_1=10$ mm/s (Soil 1) and $k_2=1$ mm/s (Soil 2). Unit weight of water $=10$ kN/m$^3$. Ignore velocity head. At steady state, what is the total head (in m, rounded to two decimals) at the junction of the two samples?

For the flow setup shown, hydraulic conductivities are $k_1=10$ mm/s (Soil 1) and $k_2=1$ mm/s (Soil 2). Unit weight of water $=10$ kN/m$^3$. Ignore velocity head. At steady state, what is the total head (in m, rounded to two decimals) at the junction of the two samples?
