Since the armature resistance drop is fairly small next to the supply voltage, another common approach is to estimate the torque using the supply voltage directly rather than first solving for the back emf, treating the small internal drop as a secondary correction. Checking how reasonable that simplification is here shows which option it points to.
The armature resistance drop is \( I_a R_a = 60 \times 0.5 = 30 \) V, which is about \( \dfrac{30}{350} \times 100 \approx 8.6\% \) of the \(350\) V supply, a relatively small correction.
Estimating torque directly from the supply-side power, \( T \approx \dfrac{V I_a}{\omega} = \dfrac{350 \times 60}{94.25} = \dfrac{21000}{94.25} \approx 222.8 \text{ Nm} \).
The supply-voltage-based estimate lines up with the first option once reasonable rounding is allowed for.
Therefore, the correct answer is 223.5 Nm.