All four options for the octal equivalent of \( 153.513 \) begin with \( 231.40 \), so the integer part and the first two fractional digits are not in dispute. The difference lies entirely in the remaining digits, so recomputing just those later multiplication steps precisely settles which option is correct.
The fractional conversion up to this point has already produced digits 4 and 0 from these steps:
\[ 0.513 \times 8 = 4.104 \Rightarrow 4 \]\[ 0.104 \times 8 = 0.832 \Rightarrow 0 \]Continuing carefully from \( 0.832 \):
\[ 0.832 \times 8 = 6.656 \Rightarrow 6 \]\[ 0.656 \times 8 = 5.248 \Rightarrow 5 \]\[ 0.248 \times 8 = 1.984 \Rightarrow 1 \]\[ 0.984 \times 8 = 7.872 \Rightarrow 7 \]This precise recomputation yields the digit sequence \( 6, 5, 1, 7 \), confirming the fractional part as \( .406517 \). Now checking each option against this sequence:
Only one option reproduces the recomputed fractional digits exactly, with no deviation at any step.
Therefore, the correct answer is 231.406517.