Instead of hunting for counterexamples first, this approach starts from the one option that looks structurally different (S1 and S3 forcing S2), proves it directly with a short contradiction argument, then uses quick counterexamples to knock out the rest.
The contradiction in the last case cannot be avoided for any choice of which number we call $a$, since the same argument works symmetrically for any of the four numbers. So (S1) and (S3) together do guarantee (S2).
Let's summarize:
The only option that survives every test is that (S1) and (S3) together imply (S2).