Step 1: Rearrange Euler's formula to predict the edge count.
With one body, no holes, and no inner loops on any face, Euler's relation $F - E + V = 2$ can be rewritten as $E = F + V - 2$. Instead of computing $F-E+V$ directly, this step checks whether the reported edge count $E$ matches what $F$ and $V$ demand.
Step 2: Test P1.
Predicted $E = 6 + 8 - 2 = 12$. The table lists $E = 12$, so P1 is consistent.
Step 3: Test P2.
Predicted $E = 5 + 5 - 2 = 8$. The table lists $E = 8$, so P2 is fine too.
Step 4: Test P3.
Predicted $E = 5 + 8 - 2 = 11$. The table lists $E = 12$ instead, one edge more than a valid solid with those face and vertex counts could have.
Step 5: Test P4.
Predicted $E = 10 + 16 - 2 = 24$. The table lists $E = 24$, matching exactly.
Final Answer:
Only P3 has an edge count that disagrees with what Euler's formula demands, so it cannot represent a genuine closed polyhedron.
\[ \boxed{P3} \]