Step 1: Clarify what the problem asks.
The task is not to determine the maximum element of the list.
Instead, we only need to identify one element that is definitely not the largest.
This requirement makes the problem much simpler than finding the maximum.
Step 2: Use a simple logical insight.
Take any two different elements from the list and compare them.
Between two unequal elements, one must be smaller than the other.
That smaller element cannot possibly be the largest element in the entire list.
Step 3: Count the number of comparisons needed.
Only one comparison is enough:
The selected element is guaranteed to be not the maximum, regardless of the rest of the list.
Thus, the same single comparison works in both the best and worst cases.
Step 4: Evaluate the options.
(A) 1: Correct, since one comparison suffices.
(B) $N-1$: Required for finding the maximum, not for finding a non-maximum element.
(C) $N$: Unnecessarily large number of comparisons.
(D) $2N-1$: Not relevant to this task.
Step 5: Final conclusion.
The minimum number of comparisons required is:
\[ \boxed{1} \]