Step 1: Turn the question around, ask what energy each wavelength represents.
Rather than convert the bandgap to a wavelength first, check the photon energy of each option directly with $E=\dfrac{hc}{\lambda}$, using the combination $hc=6.63\times10^{-34}\times3\times10^8=1.989\times10^{-25}$ J·m, and remembering $1$ eV $=1.6\times10^{-19}$ J.
Step 2: Work out the energy for option (A), $1410$ nm.
\[ E=\frac{1.989\times10^{-25}}{1410\times10^{-9}}=1.41\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}=0.88\ \text{eV} \]
This is well below the $1.3$ eV bandgap, so a photon this small cannot come from band-to-band recombination.
Step 3: Work out the energy for option (B), $1090$ nm.
\[ E=\frac{1.989\times10^{-25}}{1090\times10^{-9}}=1.82\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}=1.14\ \text{eV} \]
Still below $1.3$ eV, so this too cannot be emitted.
Step 4: Work out the energy for option (C), $950$ nm.
\[ E=\frac{1.989\times10^{-25}}{950\times10^{-9}}=2.09\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}=1.31\ \text{eV} \]
This lands right on the bandgap of $1.3$ eV, exactly where recombination photons are expected.
Step 5: Work out the energy for option (D), $510$ nm.
\[ E=\frac{1.989\times10^{-25}}{510\times10^{-9}}=3.90\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}=2.44\ \text{eV} \]
This is almost double the bandgap. A single band-edge recombination event in this material has no way to give out that much energy.
Step 6: Conclude.
Options (A), (B) and (D) all sit at photon energies the material's bandgap cannot produce, so the LED will NOT emit in these three ranges, while (C) is where it does emit.
\[ \boxed{\text{(A), (B) and (D) are the wavelengths where the LED does NOT emit}} \]