| EmpID | TeamID |
|---|---|
| 1 | 8 |
| 2 | 8 |
| 3 | 8 |
| 4 | 7 |
| 5 | 7 |
| 6 | 9 |
| EmpID | TeamSize |
|---|---|
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 2 |
| 5 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 |
SELECT E.EmpID, B.TeamSize FROM Employee AS E, (SELECT TeamID, COUNT(TeamID) AS TeamSize FROM Employee GROUP BY TeamID) AS B WHERE E.TeamID = B.TeamID
SELECT A.EmpID, COUNT(B.TeamID) AS TeamSize FROM Employee AS A, Employee AS B WHERE A.TeamID = B.TeamID AND A.EmpID = B.EmpID GROUP BY A.EmpID
SELECT B.EmpID, B.TeamSize FROM (SELECT EmpID, COUNT(TeamID) AS TeamSize FROM Employee GROUP BY EmpID) AS B
SELECT A.EmpID, B.TeamSize FROM Employee AS A, (SELECT COUNT(TeamID) AS TeamSize FROM Employee GROUP BY TeamID) AS B WHERE A.TeamID = B.TeamID
This question checks whether a SQL query correctly computes, for every employee, the number of employees who belong to the same team. The Employee table has EmpID as the primary key and a NOT NULL TeamID, and the target output attaches each employee's team size next to their EmpID. Let's test each candidate query against the sample data directly.
Only option (A) both runs correctly and produces the exact TeamSize values shown in the target output table.
Let's summarize:
So the correct query is option (A).