
Alternative — find the actual reflection point on the interface using the similar-triangles (unfolded-path) construction, instead of the image-source shortcut.
The source S is a vertical distance \(h_1=2\) km above the reflector, and the receiver R is a vertical distance \(h_2=2-0.8=1.2\) km above the reflector, with a total horizontal separation of \(1\) km between S and R. For a flat reflector, the reflection point divides that horizontal separation in the same ratio as \(h_1:h_2\) (this follows from unfolding the reflected ray into a straight line and using similar triangles):
\[ \dfrac{x_0}{1-x_0}=\dfrac{h_1}{h_2}=\dfrac{2}{1.2}=\dfrac{5}{3} \ \Rightarrow\ x_0=\dfrac{5}{8}=0.625\ \text{km} \]
Now sum the two ray segments directly:
\(d_1=\sqrt{x_0^2+h_1^2}=\sqrt{0.625^2+2^2}=\sqrt{0.3906+4}=\sqrt{4.3906}=2.0954\ \text{km}\)
\(d_2=\sqrt{(1-x_0)^2+h_2^2}=\sqrt{0.375^2+1.2^2}=\sqrt{0.1406+1.44}=\sqrt{1.5806}=1.2572\ \text{km}\)
Total path length \(=d_1+d_2=2.0954+1.2572=3.3526\) km — identical to the image-source result.
\[ t=\dfrac{3.3526}{3}\approx1.118\ \text{s} \]
Both independent methods agree exactly, confirming the answer sits inside 1.116–1.120 s.