Question:hard

Consider a Boolean function F with the following minterm expression:
𝐹(𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝑆) = βˆ‘π‘š (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14)
Which of the following options is/are the minimal sum-of-products expression(s)
of F ?

Show Hint

First pull out the two essential prime implicants \(P'S\) (covers minterms 1,3,5,7) and \(QR'\) (covers 4,5,12,13) -- these appear in every correct option. The remaining minterms 2, 10, 14 cannot form a quad, so they must be covered by two overlapping pairs; there are two equally valid ways to pair them up, which is why two options are simultaneously correct.
Updated On: Aug 3, 2026
  • 𝑃̅𝑆+ 𝑄𝑅̅ + 𝑃̅𝑄̅𝑅+ 𝑄̅𝑅𝑆̅
  • 𝑃̅𝑆+ 𝑄𝑅̅ + 𝑃̅𝑄̅𝑅+ 𝑃𝑅𝑆̅
  • 𝑃̅𝑆+ 𝑄𝑅̅ + 𝑃𝑄𝑆̅ + 𝑃𝑅𝑆̅
  • 𝑃̅𝑆+ 𝑄𝑅̅ + 𝑃𝑄𝑆̅ + 𝑄̅𝑅𝑆̅
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B, D

Solution and Explanation

A different route: check each option by verifying its five (or four) product terms cell by cell instead of redrawing the whole map.
Step 1: List the target minterms. \(F = \sum m(1,2,3,4,5,7,10,12,13,14)\), so the missing (0) minterms are 0, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15. Any candidate expression is correct only if it produces exactly the 10 minterms above and never touches a 0-minterm.
Step 2: Decode each product term into the minterms it turns on. \(P'S\) turns on all minterms with \(P=0, S=1\), that is 1, 3, 5, 7. \(QR'\) turns on all minterms with \(Q=1, R=0\), that is 4, 5, 12, 13. These two terms together give 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13 -- still missing 2, 10, 14, and every option must supply these three from its remaining two terms.
Step 3: Test the remaining terms of each option against 2, 10, 14 only.
Option 1 remaining terms \(P'Q'R, Q'RS'\): \(P'Q'R\) gives minterms 2, 3; \(Q'RS'\) gives minterms 2, 10. Union = {2,3,10}. Minterm 14 never appears, so Option 1 fails.
Option 2 remaining terms \(P'Q'R, PRS'\): \(P'Q'R\) gives 2, 3; \(PRS'\) gives 10, 14. Union with earlier set = {1,2,3,4,5,7,10,12,13,14}, exactly matching F. Option 2 works.
Option 3 remaining terms \(PQS', PRS'\): \(PQS'\) gives 12, 14; \(PRS'\) gives 10, 14. Union = {10,12,14}, minterm 2 never appears, so Option 3 fails.
Option 4 remaining terms \(PQS', Q'RS'\): \(PQS'\) gives 12, 14; \(Q'RS'\) gives 2, 10. Union with earlier set = {1,2,3,4,5,7,10,12,13,14}, exactly matching F. Option 4 works.
Step 4: Confirm no 0-minterm sneaks in. None of \(P'Q'R\), \(PRS'\), \(PQS'\), \(Q'RS'\) produces 0, 6, 8, 9, 11 or 15 (each can be checked directly from its defining literals), so both Option 2 and Option 4 stay consistent with F everywhere.
Final answer: options 2 and 4 are the correct minimal sum-of-products expressions.
Was this answer helpful?
0


Questions Asked in GATE CS exam