Question:medium

Complete the following figure matrix.

Show Hint

In figure matrices, if one pattern (like superimposition) seems too complex or doesn't work, try a simpler logic. Count elements, shaded regions, or number of lines. Sometimes the pattern is numerical (e.g., 1, 2, 4) rather than purely geometric.
Updated On: Mar 26, 2026
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Conceptualization:
This problem requires identifying a pattern within a 3x3 matrix of figures, either horizontally or vertically, to deduce the missing figure.

Step 2: Pattern Analysis:
Examining the matrix row by row reveals a pattern based on the quantity of shaded sub-sections within the main shape.


Row 1 (Triangles): Column 2: 1 shaded section. Column 3: 1 shaded section.

Row 2 (Circles): Column 2: 1 shaded section. Column 3: 2 shaded sections (semicircle).

Row 3 (Squares): Column 2: 1 shaded section.

Analyzing the options:


Option 1: 2 shaded regions.

Option 2: 4 shaded regions.

Option 3: 1 shaded region.

Option 4: Fully shaded figure (interpretable as 1 or 4 regions; pattern focuses on internal divisions).

Option 2 aligns with the observed pattern of shaded regions doubling in the third column (1 → 2 → 4).

Step 3: Conclusion:
The pattern dictates that the number of shaded regions in the third column doubles successively per row. Consequently, the missing figure must possess 4 shaded regions. Thus, Option 2 is the correct selection.

Was this answer helpful?
0