To determine the truth of the assertion (A) and reason (R), let's analyze both separately and establish their relation.
Step 1: Analyze the Assertion (A)
The assertion (A) claims that the system of linear equations \(3x - 5y + 7 = 0\) and \(-6x + 10y + 14 = 0\) is inconsistent.
To ascertain this, let's compare these two equations:
Observe that Equation 2 is a scalar multiple of Equation 1: \((-6x + 10y + 14 = 0)\) = \(-2 \times (3x - 5y + 7 = 0)\).
This implies that the two equations represent the same line, not two different parallel lines. Therefore, the system is consistent and does not lead to inconsistency.
Conclusion for Assertion (A): The assertion is false because it states the equations are inconsistent, which is incorrect as they represent the same line.
Step 2: Analyze the Reason (R)
The reason (R) states that when two linear equations don't have a unique solution, they always represent parallel lines.
The condition for two lines to not have a unique solution is when:
Since not having a unique solution implies either coincident or parallel lines, the reason (R) is false because it only considers the case of parallel lines, omitting coincident lines.
Conclusion for Reason (R): The reason is false as it does not encompass all scenarios where a unique solution is lacking.
Final Conclusion: The correct answer to the problem is:
Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false.