Step 1: Analyze Assertion (A).
In the photoelectric effect, a negative potential on the anode repels photoelectrons. The cut-off voltage (stopping potential) is the minimum negative voltage that stops all photoelectrons, making the photoelectric current zero. This is a correct definition, hence Assertion (A) is true.Step 2: Analyze Reason (R).
The threshold frequency \( f_0 \) is the minimum frequency of incident light needed to emit photoelectrons from a metal, defined by \( h f_0 = \phi \), where \( \phi \) is the work function. If the incident frequency \( f \) is less than \( f_0 \), no photoelectrons are emitted. This definition is correct, hence Reason (R) is true.Step 3: Determine if Reason (R) explains Assertion (A).
The cut-off voltage \( V_s \) relates to the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons by \( e V_s = h f - \phi \), with \( \phi = h f_0 \). While the threshold frequency \( f_0 \) sets the condition for emission (\( f>f_0 \)), the cut-off voltage is determined by the energy difference \( h f - \phi \), not directly by the definition of threshold frequency itself. Therefore, Reason (R) does not explain Assertion (A).Step 4: Conclusion.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true statements. However, Reason (R) does not provide a correct explanation for Assertion (A). The correct option is (B).