Step 1: Introduction:
The task involves ordering statements into a logical sequence that explains graft incompatibility.
Step 2: Breakdown:
The logical flow for graft incompatibility is: premise \(\rightarrow\) definition \(\rightarrow\) physical cause \(\rightarrow\) observable symptom.
\[\begin{array}{rl} 1. & \text{(B) Grafting unrelated plants often results in incompatibility. This establishes the initial rule; success depends on relatedness.} \\ 2. & \text{(A) Graft incompatibility is the inability of grafted plants to successfully unite. This defines the phenomenon from statement (B).} \\ 3. & \text{(D) This failure may stem from abnormal growth at the graft union. This describes the physical reason for the incompatibility.} \\ 4. & \text{(C) Incompatible plants show distress symptoms like stunted growth. This presents the long-term consequences of incompatibility.} \\ \end{array}\]
The correct sequence is (B), (A), (D), (C).
Step 3: Conclusion:
The correct statement order is (B), (A), (D), (C).