Question:medium

According to The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 what is the limitation period applicable to the three forums in entertaining a complaint

Show Hint

In limitation law, the starting point of the limitation period is as important as the duration itself. For consumer cases, remember it's 2 years from the date of the cause of action, not the date of purchase. This is a crucial distinction.
Updated On: Jul 13, 2026
  • 2 years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen
  • 2 years from which the article was purchased
  • 3 years
  • None of the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

The safest way to answer a limitation question like this is to isolate the two things being tested separately: how long, and from when.

  1. How long: Section 24A fixes the limitation period at two years for all three forums, District Forum, State Commission and National Commission alike, so any option proposing three years can be set aside immediately.
  2. From when: The two-year clock starts running from the date the cause of action arises, not from the date of purchase. This distinction matters because a defect or deficiency can surface long after the purchase itself, and tying limitation to the purchase date would unfairly shut out genuine complaints.
  3. Combine correctly: Only the option pairing "two years" with "cause of action" reflects the statute; the purchase-date option gets the duration right but the trigger wrong, and since a valid answer does exist among the choices, "none of the above" cannot apply.

The correct answer is 2 years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.

Was this answer helpful?
0
Show Solution

Approach Solution -2

Another way in is to think about why the statute would deliberately choose "cause of action" over the more obvious-seeming "date of purchase" as the starting point.

  1. 2 years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen: Consumer grievances, such as a manufacturing defect discovered only after months of use, or a service deficiency that emerges over time, often do not coincide with the purchase date. Anchoring limitation to the cause of action ensures a consumer is not barred before they even know they have a grievance, which is exactly the protective purpose behind Section 24A.
  2. 2 years from which the article was purchased: If limitation ran from purchase alone, a consumer whose defect surfaced after two years of otherwise normal use would have no remedy at all, defeating the protective object of the Act; this is why the legislature deliberately chose a different anchor point.
  3. 3 years: A longer period is not what the Act prescribes; adopting this figure would misstate the actual limitation window set by Section 24A.
  4. None of the above: Because the statute's own wording is reproduced almost verbatim in one of the other options, there is no basis to say none of them is correct.

Understanding the protective purpose behind the limitation clause confirms which option genuinely reflects the law.

Hence, the correct answer is 2 years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.

Was this answer helpful?
0