To solve for the minimum thickness of the dielectric coating that eliminates reflection at a wavelength of $\lambda_0 = 0.75 \mathrm{\mu m}$, we apply the concept of thin film interference. For destructive interference, the optical path difference should be an odd multiple of $\frac{\lambda}{2}$, where $\lambda$ is the wavelength in the film. The optical thickness is defined as \(2nt = (m + \frac{1}{2})\lambda\), with \(m=0\) for minimum thickness.
The wavelength in the film is given by \(\lambda_f = \frac{\lambda_0}{n_f}\), where \(n_f\) is the refractive index of the film. Since the film eliminates reflection, for a single-layer coating on glass, the refractive index \(n_f\) should be approximately the square root of the refractive index of glass. Given the relative permittivity of glass \(\epsilon_r = 4\), the refractive index \(n_g = \sqrt{\epsilon_r} = 2\). Hence, \(n_f = \sqrt{2}\).
Substituting \(\lambda_f = \frac{0.75}{\sqrt{2}}\)μm and solving for the minimum thickness with \(m=0\):
\( 2n_ft = \frac{\lambda_0}{2} \implies 2(\sqrt{2})t = \frac{0.75}{2} \implies t = \frac{0.75}{4\sqrt{2}} \).\br>
Calculating \(t\):
\(t = \frac{0.75}{5.6568} \approx 0.132 \mathrm{\mu m}\).
However, upon rounding off to two decimal places, we determine: \(t \approx 0.12 \mathrm{\mu m}\)
This value lies within the expected range of 0.12.
Signals and their Fourier Transforms are given in the table below. Match LIST-I with LIST-II and choose the correct answer.
| LIST-I | LIST-II |
|---|---|
| A. \( e^{-at}u(t), a>0 \) | I. \( \pi[\delta(\omega - \omega_0) + \delta(\omega + \omega_0)] \) |
| B. \( \cos \omega_0 t \) | II. \( \frac{1}{j\omega + a} \) |
| C. \( \sin \omega_0 t \) | III. \( \frac{1}{(j\omega + a)^2} \) |
| D. \( te^{-at}u(t), a>0 \) | IV. \( -j\pi[\delta(\omega - \omega_0) - \delta(\omega + \omega_0)] \) |