Step 1: Write down what changes when the water table rises.
Before the rise, the footing sits above the water table, so the overburden pressure above the base uses the given (moist) unit weight $\gamma=20$ kN/m$^3$: $q_{before} = \gamma D_f = 20\times1.5=30$ kPa.
After the rise, water fills the ground up to the surface, so this soil becomes buoyant. Taking the submerged unit weight as roughly $\gamma' \approx \gamma - \gamma_w \approx 20-9.81=10.19$ kN/m$^3$, $q_{after}=\gamma' D_f = 10.19\times1.5=15.29$ kPa.
Step 2: Compute the gross ultimate bearing capacity in both cases.
$q_u = cN_c+qN_q$, with $N_c=5.7$, $N_q=1$ for $\phi=0$ clay:
Before: $q_u(\text{gross,before}) = 20\times5.7+30\times1 = 114+30=144$ kPa.
After: $q_u(\text{gross,after}) = 20\times5.7+15.29\times1=114+15.29=129.29$ kPa.
So the gross capacity does drop when the water table rises, by about 14.7 kPa.
Step 3: Subtract the overburden to get the net capacity in both cases.
Net capacity removes exactly the surcharge $q$ that was already acting before construction:
Before: $q_u(\text{net,before}) = 144-30=114$ kPa.
After: $q_u(\text{net,after}) = 129.29-15.29=114$ kPa.
Step 4: Compare the two net values.
Both net values come out to exactly 114 kPa, since $q_u(net)=cN_c$ only whenever $N_q=1$, which is always true for $\phi=0$ soil. The rise in water table changes the gross capacity but leaves the net capacity, which is what the footing actually has to resist beyond the weight of soil it replaces, unchanged.
Step 5: State the percentage change.
\[ \%\text{change} = \frac{114-114}{114}\times100=0\% \]
\[ \boxed{0.00\%} \]