Question:medium

A relation $R$ is said to be circular if $aRb$ and $bRc$ together imply $cRa$. Which of the following options is/are correct?

Show Hint

To verify equivalence relations, always check reflexivity first; without it, equivalence cannot be guaranteed.
Updated On: Jan 30, 2026
  • If a relation $S$ is reflexive and symmetric, then $S$ is an equivalence relation.
  • If a relation $S$ is circular and symmetric, then $S$ is an equivalence relation.
  • If a relation $S$ is reflexive and circular, then $S$ is an equivalence relation.
  • If a relation $S$ is transitive and circular, then $S$ is an equivalence relation.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Conditions for an equivalence relation.
For a relation to qualify as an equivalence relation, it must satisfy all three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.


Step 2: Understand the meaning of circularity.
Circularity indicates a backward linkage in the relation. Specifically, if aRb and bRc, then cRa.

By itself, this condition does not directly ensure symmetry or transitivity unless additional properties are present.


Step 3: Examine each option.

Option (A): A relation that is reflexive and symmetric may still fail to be transitive. Therefore, this combination is insufficient.

Option (B): Circularity together with symmetry does not guarantee that every element is related to itself, so reflexivity is missing.

Option (C): Reflexivity gives aRa for all a. When combined with circularity, symmetry and transitivity can be logically deduced, satisfying all requirements of an equivalence relation.

Option (D): Even with transitivity and circularity, reflexivity is not ensured, so this option fails.


Final Conclusion:
The relation becomes an equivalence relation only under option (C).

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Relations


Questions Asked in GATE CS exam