Question:medium

A patient presents with irregularly irregular pulse and palpitations. He arrives 2.5 hours after symptom onset. There is no history of diabetes and BP is 160/100 mmHg. What is the next best step?

Show Hint

Stable atrial fibrillation usually needs rate control; unstable AF needs urgent synchronized cardioversion.
Updated On: May 14, 2026
  • Control ventricular rate with verapamil
  • Emergent cardioversion
  • Transesophageal echo (TEE)
  • Wait and watch
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The patient has acute onset (< 48 hours) Atrial Fibrillation. He is hemodynamically stable (high BP). We need the most appropriate immediate step.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:

Rate Control Priority: In a hemodynamically stable patient with AF, the initial management focus is "Rate Control" to improve symptoms and prevent tachycardia-induced complications.

Choice of Drug: Verapamil or Diltiazem (Non-DHP CCBs) or Beta-blockers are used for acute rate control in AF. Verapamil (Option A) effectively slows the AV node.

Cardioversion (Option B): "Emergent" cardioversion is reserved for unstable patients (e.g., hypotension, shock, acute pulmonary edema). A BP of 160/100 mmHg indicates the patient is stable. While cardioversion can be done later, it is not the "emergent" next step.

TEE (Option C): A TEE is usually done to rule out thrombus before cardioverting someone whose AF duration is unknown or > 48 hours. Since this is 2.5 hours, a TEE isn't strictly needed for cardioversion, but rate control remains the priority.

Step 3: Final Answer:
The next best step for a hemodynamically stable patient with symptomatic atrial fibrillation is to achieve Rate Control.
Was this answer helpful?
0