The clinical story is a textbook one. A toddler develops a seal like barking cough, noisy breathing on inspiration and respiratory distress over two or three days, with low grade fever. This is croup, or acute laryngotracheobronchitis, a viral illness usually driven by parainfluenza.
Now check each statement. The obstruction in croup sits at the subglottis, which is the tightest segment of a child airway, so saying symptoms come mainly from subglottic involvement is true. On imaging this subglottic swelling produces the classic steeple sign, and the airway above can balloon out as the hypopharynx dilates, so the radiology statement is true too. Epidemiology shows the disease favours boys, so that statement holds as well.
The trap is the treatment. Since a virus is to blame, an antibiotic does nothing for the swelling. Real treatment is supportive: keep the child calm, give humidified oxygen, use nebulised adrenaline when distress is significant, and give a single dose of dexamethasone to shrink the oedema. Antibiotics enter only if a bacterial complication is proven. So the claim that antibiotics are the mainstay is the wrong statement.
\[\boxed{\text{Antibiotics form the mainstay of treatment}}\]