Work through the MTP Amendment Act 2021 thresholds.
(Note: this question has no printed answer key, so the response is derived from current Indian MTP law.) The patient is a $14$-year-old unmarried rape survivor at $22$ weeks. Decide which statement is legally correct by applying the gestational ceilings and conditions of the amended Act.
The 24-week special category: The MTP (Amendment) Act 2021 extended the upper limit from $20$ to $24$ weeks for defined vulnerable groups, which specifically include rape/incest survivors and minors. A $14$-year-old rape victim is exactly such a case, so termination is lawful up to $24$ weeks - making the statement 'MTP can be done in rape victim till $24$ wks' true.
Checking the doctor-opinion rule: The number of opinions depends on gestation - ONE RMP up to $20$ weeks, but TWO RMPs for $20$-$24$ weeks. Since she is at $22$ weeks, two opinions are needed, so 'only one doctor's opinion required' is incorrect.
Checking the 'risk of life only' claim: Pregnancy arising from rape is presumed in law to cause grave injury to the woman's mental health, which is itself a valid ground; termination is not restricted solely to situations threatening the woman's life, so that option is wrong.
Checking the Medical Board requirement: A State Medical Board's sanction is mandated only for terminations BEYOND $24$ weeks (substantial fetal abnormalities). At $22$ weeks no Medical Board clearance is the prerequisite, so that option does not apply here.
Therefore the single accurate statement is that MTP may be performed for a rape victim up to $24$ weeks.
Answer: A (MTP can be done in rape victim till 24 wks).